|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Originally Posted by K Major The Saints organization have hitched their wagons to Derek Carr for the forseeable future. Mr. career 72-87 as a pro QB . I would have to agree, but when DA is fired it will change!...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Fan Since 1967
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,606
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,379
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
Especially with the other 31 head coaches and staff whose planes all crashed head on into each other. At that point we would not be able to attract a better candidate than DA with at least 20 teams and several coordinator and staff positions being more attractive to the available candidates.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 4,068
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,783
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,379
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
If the organization has hitched its wagons to the Titanic, its wagons are now submarines.
As an organization we can roll over $50 million potential dead cap hits year to year on a league average QB, trade picks to prepare for a potential transition to a younger more affordable mobile QB with lots of risk but high ceiling, or pay $10m+ a year to an aging wildcat QB, but doing all at once is nonsense. If we traded for Fields he would have to be either an option to take over for Carr or an extra weapon wildcat formations, but that makes no sense when we borrowing heavily against Carr's contract to commit ourselves futher to Carr where exiting would force a major rebuild and we already have $10m committed at the wildcat QB spot with Hill. The only way it would make sense to take on Fields even as a cheap short term backup would be if we moved on from Hill. This would both create a role for Fields to be utilized while Carr is still the starter, and clear up salary cap long term for if we ever did want to transition from Carr to Fields. I don't think Fields is a high end starting QB in the NFL but if we didn't have Hill I would not oppose him as a backup if he came cheap and the cost was later refunded in comp picks or trade. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,379
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
https://www.nbcsports.com/nfl/profoo...gn-with-saints
Hopefully Peterman is more of a 3rd /4th QB to fill the Book / Bortles role in camp. I dont think he is a credible #2 QB in the NFL and he is not even young anymore and I would feel more comfortable with Haener or Hill under center, but we need camp players. I think/hope the articles reporting him as a replacement for Winston are wrong, we may replace Winston internally, or in the draft, but Peterman is not Winston, he is Bortles. There is actually a principle named after him I believe. |
Last edited by BakoSaint; 03-14-2024 at 04:15 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,606
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
Originally Posted by BakoSaint
Yes, The Nathan Principle. “Always on the side of right”. ![]()
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Truth Addict
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R)
Posts: 24,756
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 2,729
|
Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
Peterman sucks, if Haener can't beat him out then he needs to be cut.
|
![]() |
![]() |