Restructure, restructure, restructure, restructure, restructure... Whats the deal with all these restructures.

It's called maximization of cap value. The contracts are written in a manner to purposely be restructured. We are not restructuring because we HAVE to restructure. We are restructuring because we PLANNED to restructure years ago when the contracts were initially drawn. Whether you like it or not that's the accounting methodology they chose to use almost two decades ago. Over that same period of time only a tiny number of NFL teams have won more games ... Ravens, Steelers, Packers, Patriots. (Source - Statmuse "most total nfl wins last 18 years")

It is what it is and there's nothing you can do to change it. Either accept it or move on to some other team that does things the way you want. I don't care which. But ruining the forum with your constant b!tching isn't going to help anyone.

It's called maximization of cap value. The contracts are written in a manner to purposely be restructured. We are not restructuring because we HAVE to restructure. We are restructuring because we PLANNED to restructure years ago when the contracts were initially drawn. Whether you like it or not that's the accounting methodology they chose to use almost two decades ago. Over that same period of time only a tiny number of NFL teams have won more games ... Ravens, Steelers, Packers, Patriots. (Source - Statmuse "most total nfl wins last 18 years")

It is what it is and there's nothing you can do to change it. Either accept it or move on to some other team that does things the way you want. I don't care which. But ruining the forum with your constant b!tching isn't going to help anyone.

While almost nothing Mickey Loomis does makes any sense to me, we do have some things in common being carbon based life forms who breathe air and eat food. If we keep Michael Thomas, I just don't know anymore, it would make zero sense, maybe Mickey is living on another planet. I think MT's market value is $4 million or less. He went to twitter war with the $30 million QB. The dude is gone. I wish him luck. I don't buy any kind of suspense here.

Restructuring does have its downsides. It does generally get ugly at the end because of the dead money it leaves after the player is gone or is no longer productive for the team. We carries Brees' final contract a full two years past his retirement. And that's even after Brees taking a literal pay cut when he retired. And those are funds that cannot be reinvested back into the current team. We will see similar situations with Cam, Kamara, Ram, Lattimore, and Demario in the coming years. I know that this method allows the team to keep high level players in an expensive free market so I personally don't complain too much.

I get pushing salary and bonuses into future years with bigger caps. But the final landings feel more like a crash than just being bumpy.

SFIAH

Let's talk about the restructuring myth for a moment. Restructuring a contract for a five year fifty million dollars that is guaranteed is paid off at the end of the contract regardless. ML can spend $10 million each year over five years or he can give $5 million for the first four years and the balance at the end of the contract.

Restructuring contracts doesn't cost more money! It just pushes it into future years while the cap expands each year and we have free money to spend. Yes, eating a large sum at the end of a contract is hard to do while writing smaller checks in the beginning is easy to do.

Also, the cap went up $30 million this year which we got to spend last year. Let that sink in for a moment. Creative accounting equals free money.