|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Would anyone consider moving up after pick 42? Just thinking say you get Cunningham or McDowell there and the other and another pass rusher is on the board would throw both 3s at someone looking to move down to get ...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Would anyone consider moving up after pick 42?
Just thinking say you get Cunningham or McDowell there and the other and another pass rusher is on the board would throw both 3s at someone looking to move down to get back into the 2nd |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Site Donor
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Colorado Springs Co
Posts: 2,760
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
But you didn't have the bottom of the league defense for three to four years in a row.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
We were all saying the team needed pass rushers and secondary; they grab the best CB in the draft and everyone *******... I just don't get it
![]() Pass rusher is a certainty today; as well ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Niners don't believe Reuben Foster needs another surgery - NFL.com
That would of made sense, for those who want to complain about Lattimores hamstring ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
I may be in the minority, but I didn't feel like CB was a need, that's why I'm *****y about the pick. I understand the position was decimated by injuries last year, but that was last year. I understand that it could happen to the same group again this year, but it could just as easily be the D-line, or LB's or WR's or any other position group that gets hit this year. Or maybe, just maybe we'll get through this year without a crap ton of injuries to any particular group. I hope Lattimore turns out to be great, but I'd almost be willing to bet my life that Foster will be great. But whatever, my say doesn't matter so all I can do is hope for the best and pray that we don't live to regret passing on him.
|
Mais forte do que a morte
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Only time will tell. I don't hate the pick. I mean We aren't a team that drafts on needs we have been a BPA with that in mind I do like the pick. Lets hope they hit homeruns and make the team.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Alexandria, La
Posts: 11,303
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
Here is a bunch of highlight videos of Ramchzyk
http://www.fieldgulls.com/2017/4/27/...-chris-wormley |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
Moderator
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: New Haven Ct
Posts: 23,990
|
Re: Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32
I love these two picks!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/82567-despite-defensive-needs-saints-pick-offensive-tackle-no-32-a.html
|
||||
Posted By | For | Type | Date | Hits |
Despite defensive needs, Saints pick offensive tackle at No. 32 | This thread | Refback | 04-28-2017 08:03 AM | 3 |