Okay, Winston had 95 completions before he was injured. So you are saying that Kamara had at least 48 of those, right? That would be MOST. Kamara only had 28 receptions through the first seven games. He had one game (Giants) where he wasn't even targeted by Winston a single time.

And no, I don't believe you are stupid enough to declare Siemian is better than Brees at any point of Brees' career. And I hope you aren't stupid enough to claim Siemian is as good as Brees was at any point of his career.

And you mentioned lack of mobility. Brees at his oldest and slowest was more pocket aware and able to avoid trouble than Siemian has been throughout his career. I honestly don't get why you are so enamored with Siemian. He's no more than an somewhat adequate short term back-up.

Why don’t you quit being an ass and address my point instead of double speaking? The point I bolded for you! Where do I indicate any form of high praise for Simeon? How did I indicate I was enamored with him? Hint, I didn’t. You can disagree with my point and say Hill would be a better choice if you want and I’ll respect that. But kiss my ass when you put words in my mouth and misrepresent what I say.

You said what you said. Twist it as you want after the fact. As to your bolded (by that I assume you meant capitalized) text, it's fine that you have doubts that Hill would be an improvement over Siemian. Then again, you also doubted Brees would be an improvement over Siemian. That your prerogative, of course.

The sick thing is you have accused me of being argumentative. You are one of the least self-aware people I’ve ever encountered online. Please tell me you are going on another cruise soon.

I'll let you know! Thanks!

The sick thing is you have accused me of being argumentative. You are one of the least self-aware people I’ve ever encountered online. Please tell me you are going on another cruise soon.