New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com

New Orleans Saints Forums - blackandgold.com (https://blackandgold.com/community/)
-   Saints (https://blackandgold.com/saints/)
-   -   Featured Discussion Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion (https://blackandgold.com/saints/103550-official-2024-free-agency-discussion.html)

mapcow 02-11-2024 11:38 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 992711)
Hey, it is what it is. They run the team, not us. ;)

....hence, Mediocracy! :beatnik:

K Major 02-11-2024 11:53 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Saints should “re work” Can’t Call Mike’s deal & get him outta here.

Hasn’t been healthy (play a full season of football) in almost 4 years now. AT Perry is young & shows promise. Give him more reps.

MT is an OLD player who can’t help anymore.

SmashMouth 02-11-2024 11:56 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 992930)
Saints should “re work” Can’t Call Mike’s deal & get him outta here.

Hasn’t been healthy (play a full season of football) in almost 4 years now. AT Perry is young & shows promise. Give him more reps.

MT is an OLD player who can’t help anymore.

"Can't Help Mike" has run its course indeed. It's a shame after such a promising start. He definitely followed the mold of big contracts fall off performance, injury not withstanding.

Rugby Saint II 02-11-2024 02:04 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Maybe Klint Kubiak has a few thoughts about free agents he likes.

AsylumGuido 02-12-2024 10:17 AM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-12-2024 10:35 AM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-12-2024 10:38 AM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-13-2024 01:07 PM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

SmashMouth 02-13-2024 05:38 PM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 993012)

L I X

AsylumGuido 02-15-2024 03:47 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 

saintsfan1976 02-17-2024 07:38 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Projected market value for Saints' top pending free agents



https://saintswire.usatoday.com/list...g-free-agents/

Danno 02-17-2024 08:21 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by saintsfan1976 (Post 993267)
Projected market value for Saints' top pending free agents



https://saintswire.usatoday.com/list...g-free-agents/


OL Andrus Peat

Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports

Peat is a player that the Saints should focus on bringing back. He is the best option currently on the roster for the left tackle position, as Trevor Penning cannot be trusted.

Peat’s potential market value at left tackle is around $4.34 million. It would be a bit of a downgrade in money for Peat, but that makes sense as he’s not a player that would have much desire around him at this point of his career.


LB Zack Baun

Stephen Lew-USA TODAY Sports

Baun had a good 2023 campaign that will earn him some money. He helped himself a lot and created a market for himself in free agency. He’s a solid rotational linebacker that will likely be on a new team next season, and systems that will let him rush the passer more often could get a bargain.

Baun’s projected value is around $4.2 million. Some other linebackers that made that much on average in 2023 were Leighton Vander Esch, David Long Jr. and E.J. Speed.

CB Isaac Yiadom

Matthew Hinton-USA TODAY Sports

Yiadom had a resurgence with the Saints last season. He stepped up big-time when Lattimore was out and beat expectations coming in off the bench. He should be a priority to bring back for the Saints.

After playing for the minimum last season, his potential market value has risen to around $3.7 million. Other players at that mark were Sean Murphy-Bunting, Levi Wallace and Isaiah Oliver.

DT Malcolm Roach

Katelyn Mulcahy/Getty Images

Roach had a nice season and could see a similar contract to what former Saints defensive tackle Shy Tuttle last season. Roach posted similar production to Tuttle’s last year in New Orleans, before he was signed away by the Carolina Panthers at $6.5 million per year.

OTC has Roach’s valuation lower at around $1.1 million per year. That would have him making around the same money that he has been for the last couple of years.

KEEPERS!

Danno 02-17-2024 08:27 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 993224)

Jauan Jennings has put together an impressive resume. The Saints are hiring one of his coaches as their new offensive coordinator — San Francisco 49ers passing game specialist Klint Kubiak, in case you missed it — and Jennings should be an option in free agency. He’s one of 10 49ers free agents we highlighted as potential Saints targets. And his performance in Super Bowl LVIII was the most compelling argument yet for getting him in a black and gold jersey.
Good fit.

K Major 02-17-2024 10:47 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
I'd move on from Baun, Kyle Phillips & Garcia.

Saints need better depth.

AsylumGuido 02-20-2024 03:34 PM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-20-2024 05:10 PM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-21-2024 08:20 AM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 
Apparently, Cam was playing through an ankle injury of which we were not aware.


AsylumGuido 02-21-2024 08:22 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-21-2024 08:23 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-22-2024 04:50 PM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

AsylumGuido 02-22-2024 05:52 PM

Re: 2024 Saints Off-Season General News and Discussion
 

K Major 02-23-2024 11:38 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Saints need to target a DE in FA. Cam(2 sacks in 17 games) will be 35 years of age at the start of camp & is nothing more than a rotational piece at this point. Granderson is good but needs help. Foskey played in 10 (healthy scratch in a lot of games) before getting injured.

Jets DE Bryce Huff is a UFA.

NO needs serious help with the pass rush in 2024. It's a must.

Get younger & faster. I'd double down with Jared Verse @ pick #14.

BakoSaint 02-23-2024 08:30 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
I could live with moving on from Baun.

I think it is really important to keep Yiadom. If we move on from Yiadom because we 'don't have a spot for him' it just shows that we are trapped in the contracts to the aging Lattimore, Maye, and Mathieu. I want a young secondary.

K Major 02-24-2024 09:18 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Marcus Maye should be a post June 1 cut.

Over 7M in cap savings.

Besides, Jordan Howden is the future at SS.

BakoSaint 02-24-2024 09:52 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by K Major (Post 993492)
Marcus Maye should be a post June 1 cut.

Over 7M in cap savings.

Besides, Jordan Howden is the future at SS.

The problem with Post-June-1 cuts is that the savings does not hit the salary cap until June 1 and you have to be under the cap way before that. Hopefully we can have enough cap space to make post-June-1 cuts.

AsylumGuido 02-26-2024 03:36 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 

BakoSaint 02-26-2024 03:47 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 993576)

While almost nothing Mickey Loomis does makes any sense to me, we do have some things in common being carbon based life forms who breathe air and eat food. If we keep Michael Thomas, I just don't know anymore, it would make zero sense, maybe Mickey is living on another planet. I think MT's market value is $4 million or less. He went to twitter war with the $30 million QB. The dude is gone. I wish him luck. I don't buy any kind of suspense here.

Sinner 02-26-2024 04:04 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BakoSaint (Post 993584)
While almost nothing Mickey Loomis does makes any sense to me, we do have some things in common being carbon based life forms who breathe air and eat food. If we keep Michael Thomas, I just don't know anymore, it would make zero sense, maybe Mickey is living on another planet. I think MT's market value is $4 million or less. He went to twitter war with the $30 million QB. The dude is gone. I wish him luck. I don't buy any kind of suspense here.

You’ll see more suspense from him on twitter, than on the field.

K Major 02-26-2024 04:22 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
DE Dorance Armstrong is still high on my list.

He has been very good in Dallas pass rush rotation last several seasons, consistently gets in the backfield and you can count in him to suit up & play on Sundays.

AsylumGuido 02-26-2024 04:33 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BakoSaint (Post 993584)
While almost nothing Mickey Loomis does makes any sense to me, we do have some things in common being carbon based life forms who breathe air and eat food. If we keep Michael Thomas, I just don't know anymore, it would make zero sense, maybe Mickey is living on another planet. I think MT's market value is $4 million or less. He went to twitter war with the $30 million QB. The dude is gone. I wish him luck. I don't buy any kind of suspense here.

https://blackandgold.com/u/4973-albu...icture1520.jpg

:p

BakoSaint 02-26-2024 08:49 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 993588)

Restructure, restructure, restructure, restructure, restructure... Whats the deal with all these restructures.

AsylumGuido 02-27-2024 07:32 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BakoSaint (Post 993594)
Restructure, restructure, restructure, restructure, restructure... Whats the deal with all these restructures.

It's called maximization of cap value. The contracts are written in a manner to purposely be restructured. We are not restructuring because we HAVE to restructure. We are restructuring because we PLANNED to restructure years ago when the contracts were initially drawn. Whether you like it or not that's the accounting methodology they chose to use almost two decades ago. Over that same period of time only a tiny number of NFL teams have won more games ... Ravens, Steelers, Packers, Patriots. (Source - Statmuse "most total nfl wins last 18 years")

It is what it is and there's nothing you can do to change it. Either accept it or move on to some other team that does things the way you want. I don't care which. But ruining the forum with your constant b!tching isn't going to help anyone.

Sinner 02-27-2024 09:54 AM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 993599)
It's called maximization of cap value. The contracts are written in a manner to purposely be restructured. We are not restructuring because we HAVE to restructure. We are restructuring because we PLANNED to restructure years ago when the contracts were initially drawn. Whether you like it or not that's the accounting methodology they chose to use almost two decades ago. Over that same period of time only a tiny number of NFL teams have won more games ... Ravens, Steelers, Packers, Patriots. (Source - Statmuse "most total nfl wins last 18 years")

It is what it is and there's nothing you can do to change it. Either accept it or move on to some other team that does things the way you want. I don't care which. But ruining the forum with your constant b!tching isn't going to help anyone.

His b*tching helps you remain relevant. Otherwise, you’d be ignored, WITHOUT being set to “ignore”.

SaintFanInATLHELL 02-27-2024 12:16 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido (Post 993599)
It's called maximization of cap value. The contracts are written in a manner to purposely be restructured. We are not restructuring because we HAVE to restructure. We are restructuring because we PLANNED to restructure years ago when the contracts were initially drawn. Whether you like it or not that's the accounting methodology they chose to use almost two decades ago. Over that same period of time only a tiny number of NFL teams have won more games ... Ravens, Steelers, Packers, Patriots. (Source - Statmuse "most total nfl wins last 18 years")

It is what it is and there's nothing you can do to change it. Either accept it or move on to some other team that does things the way you want. I don't care which. But ruining the forum with your constant b!tching isn't going to help anyone.

Restructuring does have its downsides. It does generally get ugly at the end because of the dead money it leaves after the player is gone or is no longer productive for the team. We carries Brees' final contract a full two years past his retirement. And that's even after Brees taking a literal pay cut when he retired. And those are funds that cannot be reinvested back into the current team. We will see similar situations with Cam, Kamara, Ram, Lattimore, and Demario in the coming years. I know that this method allows the team to keep high level players in an expensive free market so I personally don't complain too much.

I get pushing salary and bonuses into future years with bigger caps. But the final landings feel more like a crash than just being bumpy.

SFIAH

K Major 02-27-2024 01:15 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Ravens OL John Simpson
(UFA)

Former Raven & teammate of Carr in Vegas.

He would be an upgrade over James Hurst.

lee909 02-27-2024 01:19 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
yeah restructuring is great
Having to keep declining players past there best years because its too expensive to replace them is genius. Paying a near 35 year old Cam Jordan 23ml because his dead number is 36ml and 8ml in 2026 when he won't be on the roster isn't a well planned move.

K Major 02-27-2024 01:23 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Chiefs DE Michael Danna (UFA) & only 26 years of age.

Counting on Payton Turner's health & Isaiah Foskey to even contribute in year 2 is risky.

Not a lot of cup cake QB's on the 2024 schedule & creating pressure is paramount for this Saints defense.

Rugby Saint II 02-27-2024 01:30 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by BakoSaint (Post 993584)
While almost nothing Mickey Loomis does makes any sense to me, we do have some things in common being carbon based life forms who breathe air and eat food. If we keep Michael Thomas, I just don't know anymore, it would make zero sense, maybe Mickey is living on another planet. I think MT's market value is $4 million or less. He went to twitter war with the $30 million QB. The dude is gone. I wish him luck. I don't buy any kind of suspense here.

ML has made some questionable calls recently. Making DA the HC was obviously a poor choice. Then there was the mind blowing decision to retain and then keep PC as our OC for two dysfunctional years in a row. Carrying the Payton plan forward without Payton or Drew was a mistake.

Also, we have not had a good draft in the early rounds since Payton left the building. We lacked identity on offense last year. Oh, and we are always up against the cap.

On the other hand, ML has turned this franchise around from what it was when the Saints were perennial losers with fans wearing bags on their heads. Tom Benson still ran the Saints like a used car salesman who didn't invest in his team who was always one of the cheap owners until ML influenced him to spend money on good coaches and players. We still have one of the best records in the the NFL over the last couple of decades and I give ML most of the credit.

Let's talk about the restructuring myth for a moment. Restructuring a contract for a five year fifty million dollars that is guaranteed is paid off at the end of the contract regardless. ML can spend $10 million each year over five years or he can give $5 million for the first four years and the balance at the end of the contract.

Restructuring contracts doesn't cost more money! It just pushes it into future years while the cap expands each year and we have free money to spend. Yes, eating a large sum at the end of a contract is hard to do while writing smaller checks in the beginning is easy to do. :p

Also, the cap went up $30 million this year which we got to spend last year. Let that sink in for a moment. Creative accounting equals free money.


AsylumGuido 02-27-2024 03:27 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL (Post 993615)
Restructuring does have its downsides. It does generally get ugly at the end because of the dead money it leaves after the player is gone or is no longer productive for the team. We carries Brees' final contract a full two years past his retirement. And that's even after Brees taking a literal pay cut when he retired. And those are funds that cannot be reinvested back into the current team. We will see similar situations with Cam, Kamara, Ram, Lattimore, and Demario in the coming years. I know that this method allows the team to keep high level players in an expensive free market so I personally don't complain too much.

I get pushing salary and bonuses into future years with bigger caps. But the final landings feel more like a crash than just being bumpy.

SFIAH

Yes. As with any other accounting methodology there are the advantages and disadvantages. With this method comes that "balloon" at the end. Total cost remains the same on the bottom line, however. It's not that there are funds unable to be spent, those funds have already been spent in prior periods and are just being accounted for in those latter periods. Dead cap can occur under either method, of course.

BakoSaint 02-27-2024 04:42 PM

Re: Official 2024 Free Agency Discussion
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II (Post 993624)
Let's talk about the restructuring myth for a moment. Restructuring a contract for a five year fifty million dollars that is guaranteed is paid off at the end of the contract regardless. ML can spend $10 million each year over five years or he can give $5 million for the first four years and the balance at the end of the contract.

Restructuring contracts doesn't cost more money! It just pushes it into future years while the cap expands each year and we have free money to spend. Yes, eating a large sum at the end of a contract is hard to do while writing smaller checks in the beginning is easy to do. :p

Also, the cap went up $30 million this year which we got to spend last year. Let that sink in for a moment. Creative accounting equals free money.


Restructuring contracts does cost more money. If you realize after 3 years that a 5 year $100 million contract is a mistake you might get out of it after paying $60 million over 3 years. But if you restructured it every year and had to face a $40 million dead cap hit if you moved on under year 3, you may be forced to restructure the contract for year 4 to delay the $20 million due, then face even larger dead cap leading into year 5 leading to another restructure. When the contact is set to end after Year 5, you may face a $50 million dead cap hit, and instead choose to pay a backup $15 million, a 'generous pay cut' of much more than his market value. So in the end you don't pay the same you pay $115 million instead of $60 million, and as a reward you potentially block upward mobility for your players, hold roster spots for veterans you are only keeping for financial reasons, and send the message to all your stars that their jobs are safe even if their production drops and to all your younger players that there is no room for them to start because some 30-somethings contract is too big to fail.

Dead cap is much higher, and the spare salary cap space to absorb dead cap hits is much lower, under Mickey Loomis's accounting.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:17 PM.


Copyright 1997 - 2020 - BlackandGold.com