Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED

01-05-2017, 08:21 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Because they were forcing the ball because of the depleted defense. Can't you see the obvious?

Sir, 2 of those turnoves were fumbles...no forcing, coughing it up. Both by Mike inside our 30 yard line. The other was a pass that went off the receivers hands. No forcing..off the receivers hands.

**** I just discovered we had 4 turnovers in the broncos game!!! LOL!

One of them was after we had already drove 51 yards and the score was only 7-0. Why would you be forcing the ball when you're driving to tie. Then our defense forced a punt and with the score still 7-0 here comes the second int on the very first play.

The fumbles were when we were down 17-10, and then when we were down 20-17. I see nothing showing any need for forcing.

But by all means, keep going

WhoDat!656 · 01-05-2017, 08:21 PM

Originally Posted by hagan714

oh god waiting for all love to pour forth 1 2 3 ..................................

On the bright side a lot of coaches are going to be cleaning out their lockers all around the NFL so there should be some solid hires to come.

VideoQuote: "God Bless Us, Everyone" - YouTube

spkb25 · 01-05-2017, 08:25 PM

Originally Posted by dizzle88

Before you get up on your high horse, read my post again, at no point did I say that the Offense alone was the problem in 2016. Do I believe they are to blame for some losses? Yes, of course. But the D are to blame for more.

Also I never said the offense didn't score a bunch of points, I said they committed 4 turnovers and put the D in bad spots in the Denver game and turned the ball over at critical times in the Chiefs game.

Points can be scored in garbabe time, as evidenced by the 19 we put up in the 4th quarter vs falcons which I already stated in another point was entirely the defenses fault.

Yeah, no one is acting like the offense was more of a problem or that the 25th ranked d wasn't an issue. Of course, but those 5 losses weren't on the d, plain and simple.

Danno · 01-05-2017, 08:28 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

Didn't address one fact made about those 5 games, exactly. That's called passively accepting defeat.

Now you're changing the topic.So let me get you back on topic.

The point I made was simply this, it did not extend further:

The Offense was responsible for 5 of our losses.

Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame.

Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game?

Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game?

Those were both on the ST's.

I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense.

dizzle88 · 01-05-2017, 08:31 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame.

Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game?

Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game?

Those were both on the ST's.

I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense.

The blocked PAT would have never happened or wouldn't have mattered if the Offense didn't keep the game close by turning the ball over 4 times. 3 of those in our own half.

It's just like 2011 playoffs all over again, the offense turns the ball over 5 times versus the 49ers but somehow people still blame the D because they couldnt hold.

AsylumGuido · 01-05-2017, 08:31 PM

Originally Posted by spkb25

Sir, 2 of those turnoves were fumbles...no forcing, coughing it up. Both by Mike inside our 30 yard line. The other was a pass that went off the receivers hands. No forcing..off the receivers hands.

**** I just discovered we had 4 turnovers in the broncos game!!! LOL!

One of them was after we had already drove 51 yards and the score was only 7-0. Why would you be forcing the ball when you're driving to tie. Then our defense forced a punt and with the score still 7-0 here comes the second int on the very first play.

The fumbles were when we were down 17-10, and then when we were down 20-17. I see nothing showing any need for forcing.

But by all means, keep going

And your very shadowy point is? Fire Payton? Cut Ingram? Cut Brees?

You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on about something that is meaningless considering the defense was decimated and the special teams were poor.

What point are you trying to make or are you just *****ing for the simple point of *****ing?

AsylumGuido · 01-05-2017, 08:32 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame.

Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game?

Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game?

Those were both on the ST's.

I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense.

He has dug his hole and he is willing to be buried in it. His logic is absent, but his persistence must be admired.

hagan714 · 01-05-2017, 08:33 PM

Quickest thread to 8 pages ever? LMAO

spkb25 · 01-05-2017, 08:33 PM

Originally Posted by Danno

Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame.

Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game?

Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game?

Those were both on the ST's.

I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense.

First I am glad to see you're slowly stopping your argument and now challenging me on two games verse all of them. Either way you're still wrong. You're not wrong in your premise that the offense has less blame than the defense for the entire season, that you're right about, but you're completely wrong that these 5 losses are not on the offense.

They scored 13 points against the Giants, that is their fault. Yes ST contributed, but that is their fault. All they needed to do was score 17 points bro, for Christ sakes their the number one offense in the league, wtf they cant get more than 13 frigan points, really?

The offense had 4 turnovers against the Broncos. One of those turnovers was when we were driving for points. The other three were 1 inside our 40 and 2 inside our 20. That led to 13 points. The blocked XP becomes irrelevant if not for the offensive mistakes

spkb25 · 01-05-2017, 08:36 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

And your very shadowy point is? Fire Payton? Cut Ingram? Cut Brees?

You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on about something that is meaningless considering the defense was decimated and the special teams were poor.

What point are you trying to make or are you just *****ing for the simple point of *****ing?

Oh, I see you're another one I have to make understand what my original point was.

Let me help. The original point I made was that those 5 losses were on the offense. There was nothing more to it than that. It didn't go any further.

01-05-2017, 08:21 PM	#71
Threaded by spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,097 Rating: (1 votes - 5.00 average) Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Because they were forcing the ball because of the depleted defense. Can't you see the obvious? Sir, 2 of those turnoves were fumbles...no forcing, coughing it up. Both by Mike inside our 30 yard line. The other was a pass that went off the receivers hands. No forcing..off the receivers hands. **** I just discovered we had 4 turnovers in the broncos game!!! LOL! One of them was after we had already drove 51 yards and the score was only 7-0. Why would you be forcing the ball when you're driving to tie. Then our defense forced a punt and with the score still 7-0 here comes the second int on the very first play. The fumbles were when we were down 17-10, and then when we were down 20-17. I see nothing showing any need for forcing. But by all means, keep going dizzle88 likes this.
Views: 27691

01-05-2017, 08:25 PM	#73
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,097	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Originally Posted by dizzle88 Before you get up on your high horse, read my post again, at no point did I say that the Offense alone was the problem in 2016. Do I believe they are to blame for some losses? Yes, of course. But the D are to blame for more. Also I never said the offense didn't score a bunch of points, I said they committed 4 turnovers and put the D in bad spots in the Denver game and turned the ball over at critical times in the Chiefs game. Points can be scored in garbabe time, as evidenced by the 19 we put up in the 4th quarter vs falcons which I already stated in another point was entirely the defenses fault. Yeah, no one is acting like the offense was more of a problem or that the 25th ranked d wasn't an issue. Of course, but those 5 losses weren't on the d, plain and simple.

01-05-2017, 08:28 PM	#74
Danno Truth Addict Join Date: Dec 2003 Location: Spanish Fort, AL (via NO and B/R) Posts: 24,720	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Originally Posted by spkb25 Didn't address one fact made about those 5 games, exactly. That's called passively accepting defeat. Now you're changing the topic.So let me get you back on topic. The point I made was simply this, it did not extend further: The Offense was responsible for 5 of our losses. Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame. Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game? Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game? Those were both on the ST's. I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense.

01-05-2017, 08:31 PM	#75
dizzle88 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 11,208	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Originally Posted by Danno Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame. Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game? Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game? Those were both on the ST's. I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense. The blocked PAT would have never happened or wouldn't have mattered if the Offense didn't keep the game close by turning the ball over 4 times. 3 of those in our own half. It's just like 2011 playoffs all over again, the offense turns the ball over 5 times versus the 49ers but somehow people still blame the D because they couldnt hold. spkb25 likes this.

01-05-2017, 08:31 PM	#76
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,220	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Originally Posted by spkb25 Sir, 2 of those turnoves were fumbles...no forcing, coughing it up. Both by Mike inside our 30 yard line. The other was a pass that went off the receivers hands. No forcing..off the receivers hands. ** I just discovered we had 4 turnovers in the broncos game!!! LOL! One of them was after we had already drove 51 yards and the score was only 7-0. Why would you be forcing the ball when you're driving to tie. Then our defense forced a punt and with the score still 7-0 here comes the second int on the very first play. The fumbles were when we were down 17-10, and then when we were down 20-17. I see nothing showing any need for forcing. But by all means, keep going And your very shadowy point is? Fire Payton? Cut Ingram? Cut Brees? You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on about something that is meaningless considering the defense was decimated and the special teams were poor. What point are you trying to make or are you just *ing for the simple point of ***ing?

Latest Blogs
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey

01-05-2017, 08:32 PM	#77
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,220	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Originally Posted by Danno Again no, our offense didn't play well in 5 of our losses. They were not to blame. Did you not see the blocked FG that cost us the Giants game? Did you not see the blocked PAT that cost us the Bronco's game? Those were both on the ST's. I'm a bit surprised you blame those on the offense. He has dug his hole and he is willing to be buried in it. His logic is absent, but his persistence must be admired.

01-05-2017, 08:33 PM	#78
hagan714 LB Mentallity Join Date: Dec 2005 Posts: 15,870 Blog Entries: 68	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Quickest thread to 8 pages ever? LMAO jnormand, RockyMountainSaint, Seer1 and 2 others like this.

01-05-2017, 08:36 PM	#80
spkb25 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: Baltimore, MD Posts: 13,097	Re: Vitt, Johnson, McMahon, Kwan, Willis FIRED Originally Posted by AsylumGuido And your very shadowy point is? Fire Payton? Cut Ingram? Cut Brees? You keep going on and on and on and on and on and on and on about something that is meaningless considering the defense was decimated and the special teams were poor. What point are you trying to make or are you just ***ing for the simple point of ***ing? Oh, I see you're another one I have to make understand what my original point was. Let me help. The original point I made was that those 5 losses were on the offense. There was nothing more to it than that. It didn't go any further.

LinkBacks (?) LinkBack to this Thread: https://blackandgold.com/saints/80985-vitt-johnson-mcmahon-kwan-willis-fired.html
Posted By	For	Type	Date	Hits
The Latest New Orleans Saints News \| SportSpyder	This thread	Refback	01-05-2017 06:25 PM	8