Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade?

mapcow · 10-29-2020, 10:29 AM

You were there, i am sure

Rugby Saint II · 10-29-2020, 11:31 AM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Thomas and Brees did meet in private MONTHS ago and worked it out. They have both repeatedly said this. What do either have to gain by lying about it? What you believe really doesn't matter. You are trying to make something out of nothing. Practice fights have happened since football began. Have you personally spoken with either Brees or Thomas and have been enlightened with something other than both have shared? Didn't think so, Rugs.

First off Guido, I try hard to be an honest man. Yes, I may mislead my girl once in a while but I don't lie. I'm just not very good at it.

Secondly, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar! I'm not trying to stir up ****. I simply said that I don't buy it. How is that a lie? It's a different interpretation from yours is all. I've been supportive of your disingenuous attitude but this crossed way over the line. Maybe that attitude flies on SR but not here! Thanks for being such a bright ray of sunshine...

Edit: What you believe doesn't matter to me now...at least not more than my unimportant opinion matters. Chill out!!! I just don't buy that they worked it out. I don't see the evidence. But obviously you buy it because you want to.

Oh, and let's not make this a back and forth. I've always respected your opinion. Maybe you should respect my right to have an opinion. Damn son!

AsylumGuido · 10-29-2020, 12:02 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

First off Guido, I try hard to be an honest man. Yes, I may mislead my girl once in a while but I don't lie. I'm just not very good at it.

Secondly, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar! I'm not trying to stir up ****. I simply said that I don't buy it. How is that a lie? It's a different interpretation from yours is all. I've been supportive of your disingenuous attitude but this crossed way over the line. Maybe that attitude flies on SR but not here! Thanks for being such a bright ray of sunshine...

Edit: What you believe doesn't matter to me now...at least not more than my unimportant opinion matters. Chill out!!! I just don't buy that they worked it out. I don't see the evidence. But obviously you buy it because you want to.

Oh, and let's not make this a back and forth. I've always respected your opinion. Maybe you should respect my right to have an opinion. Damn son!

Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you?

It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right.

I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand.

Rugby Saint II · 10-29-2020, 01:36 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you?

It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right.

I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand.

I did in fact misread it. Your post read they not you. My apologies! I've been reading SR too much lately.

vpheughan · 10-28-2020, 01:42 PM

"Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II
.....would not have accomplished as much with a different QB that doesn't have Drew's accuracy and ability to read the field.

Ask Jimmy Graham 51 TD as a Saint 27 with 3 other teams.

The Dude · 10-28-2020, 03:32 PM

The more I read between the lines the more I think CGJ or “Ceedy Duece” is a bigger problem and instigator than Thomas. Unfortunately Thomas threw the first punch but I get the feeling CJG is a complete dick.
Thomas can back up his personality on the field, CGJ ain’t there yet.

WW_Who_Dat · 10-28-2020, 03:48 PM

Originally Posted by The Dude

The more I read between the lines the more I think CGJ or “Ceedy Duece” is a bigger problem and instigator than Thomas. Unfortunately Thomas threw the first punch but I get the feeling CJG is a complete dick.
Thomas can back up his personality on the field, CGJ ain’t there yet.

Well stated Sir ... Unfortunately it come down to respect for your opponent. All the posturing chest thumping and thrash talking leads the this type of situation. Gone are days when players did their thing got up and went back to the huddle a defensive line without inciting the opposing player. AKA Quiet Storm.

Budsdrinker · 10-29-2020, 10:34 AM

Just can't see a $20+ million dead cap hit next year. Thomas ain't going anywhere.

AsylumGuido · 10-29-2020, 11:21 AM

Originally Posted by Budsdrinker

Just can't see a $20+ million dead cap hit next year. Thomas ain't going anywhere.

Shhhh! Quiet. I'm trying to take mapcow's money.

TheOak · 10-29-2020, 03:57 PM

Y’all argue more than the team does

As a matter of fact, y’all are arguing about an argument. Brilliant lol

By the way.... THIS place is social media, how are some people acting any different than the players?

10-29-2020, 10:29 AM	#1
mapcow Just a Fan Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,818	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? You were there, i am sure
mapcow Just a Fan Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,818

10-29-2020, 11:31 AM	#2
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 24,121	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Thomas and Brees did meet in private MONTHS ago and worked it out. They have both repeatedly said this. What do either have to gain by lying about it? What you believe really doesn't matter. You are trying to make something out of nothing. Practice fights have happened since football began. Have you personally spoken with either Brees or Thomas and have been enlightened with something other than both have shared? Didn't think so, Rugs. First off Guido, I try hard to be an honest man. Yes, I may mislead my girl once in a while but I don't lie. I'm just not very good at it. Secondly, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar! I'm not trying to stir up ****. I simply said that I don't buy it. How is that a lie? It's a different interpretation from yours is all. I've been supportive of your disingenuous attitude but this crossed way over the line. Maybe that attitude flies on SR but not here! Thanks for being such a bright ray of sunshine... Edit: What you believe doesn't matter to me now...at least not more than my unimportant opinion matters. Chill out!!! I just don't buy that they worked it out. I don't see the evidence. But obviously you buy it because you want to. Oh, and let's not make this a back and forth. I've always respected your opinion. Maybe you should respect my right to have an opinion. Damn son! gosaints1 likes this.
	There Are Two Kinds Of People In This World Being A Rugby Player Is Better Than Both Of Them

10-29-2020, 12:02 PM	#3
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,543	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II First off Guido, I try hard to be an honest man. Yes, I may mislead my girl once in a while but I don't lie. I'm just not very good at it. Secondly, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar! I'm not trying to stir up **. I simply said that I don't buy it. How is that a lie? It's a different interpretation from yours is all. I've been supportive of your disingenuous attitude but this crossed way over the line. Maybe that attitude flies on SR but not here! Thanks for being such a bright ray of sunshine... Edit: What you believe doesn't matter to me now...at least not more than my unimportant opinion matters. Chill out!!! I just don't buy that they worked it out. I don't see the evidence. But obviously you buy it because you want to. Oh, and let's not make this a back and forth. I've always respected your opinion. Maybe you should respect my right to have an opinion. Damn son! Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying** about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you? It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right. I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand. Rugby Saint II likes this.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill

10-29-2020, 01:36 PM	#4
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 24,121	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you? It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right. I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand. I did in fact misread it. Your post read they not you. My apologies! I've been reading SR too much lately.

10-28-2020, 01:42 PM	#5
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,544	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? "Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II .....would not have accomplished as much with a different QB that doesn't have Drew's accuracy and ability to read the field. Ask Jimmy Graham 51 TD as a Saint 27 with 3 other teams. Rugby Saint II, WW_Who_Dat, st thomas and 1 others like this.
vpheughan 1000 Posts + Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 4,544

10-28-2020, 03:32 PM	#6
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,055	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? The more I read between the lines the more I think CGJ or “Ceedy Duece” is a bigger problem and instigator than Thomas. Unfortunately Thomas threw the first punch but I get the feeling CJG is a complete dick. Thomas can back up his personality on the field, CGJ ain’t there yet.
The Dude 5000 POSTS! + Join Date: Jul 2011 Posts: 9,055

10-28-2020, 03:48 PM	#7
WW_Who_Dat 1000 Posts + Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: Lafayette, La and Valencia CA Posts: 1,276 Blog Entries: 1	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by The Dude The more I read between the lines the more I think CGJ or “Ceedy Duece” is a bigger problem and instigator than Thomas. Unfortunately Thomas threw the first punch but I get the feeling CJG is a complete dick. Thomas can back up his personality on the field, CGJ ain’t there yet. Well stated Sir ... Unfortunately it come down to respect for your opponent. All the posturing chest thumping and thrash talking leads the this type of situation. Gone are days when players did their thing got up and went back to the huddle a defensive line without inciting the opposing player. AKA Quiet Storm.

10-29-2020, 10:34 AM	#8
Budsdrinker A Cajun Transforming TX Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Woodlands, Texas Posts: 2,787	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Just can't see a $20+ million dead cap hit next year. Thomas ain't going anywhere. SmashMouth and gosaints1 like this.

10-29-2020, 11:21 AM	#9
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,543	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by Budsdrinker Just can't see a $20+ million dead cap hit next year. Thomas ain't going anywhere. Shhhh! Quiet. I'm trying to take mapcow's money.

10-29-2020, 03:57 PM	#10
TheOak 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Cypress Tx. Posts: 19,041	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Y’all argue more than the team does As a matter of fact, y’all are arguing about an argument. Brilliant lol By the way.... THIS place is social media, how are some people acting any different than the players? AsylumGuido, SmashMouth, Rugby Saint II and 2 others like this.