Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade?

AsylumGuido · 10-29-2020, 12:02 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

First off Guido, I try hard to be an honest man. Yes, I may mislead my girl once in a while but I don't lie. I'm just not very good at it.

Secondly, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar! I'm not trying to stir up ****. I simply said that I don't buy it. How is that a lie? It's a different interpretation from yours is all. I've been supportive of your disingenuous attitude but this crossed way over the line. Maybe that attitude flies on SR but not here! Thanks for being such a bright ray of sunshine...

Edit: What you believe doesn't matter to me now...at least not more than my unimportant opinion matters. Chill out!!! I just don't buy that they worked it out. I don't see the evidence. But obviously you buy it because you want to.

Oh, and let's not make this a back and forth. I've always respected your opinion. Maybe you should respect my right to have an opinion. Damn son!

Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you?

It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right.

I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand.

Rugby Saint II · 10-29-2020, 01:36 PM

Originally Posted by AsylumGuido

Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you?

It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right.

I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand.

I did in fact misread it. Your post read they not you. My apologies! I've been reading SR too much lately.

AsylumGuido · 10-29-2020, 01:38 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

I did in fact misread it. Your post read you not they. My apologies!

It's all cool, Rugs ... just like with Brees and Thomas.

st thomas · 10-29-2020, 02:46 PM

Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II

I did in fact misread it. Your post read they not you. My apologies! I've been reading SR too much lately.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

10-29-2020, 12:02 PM	#1
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,707	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II First off Guido, I try hard to be an honest man. Yes, I may mislead my girl once in a while but I don't lie. I'm just not very good at it. Secondly, I don't appreciate you calling me a liar! I'm not trying to stir up **. I simply said that I don't buy it. How is that a lie? It's a different interpretation from yours is all. I've been supportive of your disingenuous attitude but this crossed way over the line. Maybe that attitude flies on SR but not here! Thanks for being such a bright ray of sunshine... Edit: What you believe doesn't matter to me now...at least not more than my unimportant opinion matters. Chill out!!! I just don't buy that they worked it out. I don't see the evidence. But obviously you buy it because you want to. Oh, and let's not make this a back and forth. I've always respected your opinion. Maybe you should respect my right to have an opinion. Damn son! Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying** about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you? It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right. I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand. Rugby Saint II likes this.
	“The pessimist sees difficulty in every opportunity. The optimist sees the opportunity in every difficulty.” — Winston Churchill

10-29-2020, 01:36 PM	#2
Rugby Saint II Bounty Money $$$ Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: 5800 Airline Dr. Metairie, LA. Posts: 24,182	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by AsylumGuido Rugs. I never said you lied. Read my post again. I said that both Brees and Thomas, and for that matter Brees and Malcolm Jenkins, have stated publicly that they talked things through and are now cool. The reference to lying was my saying that none of them have anything to gain by lying about the fact that there is not a lingering issue between them. I haven't seen any evidence that they are not telling the truth, have you? It had nothing whatsoever to do with you or your opinion. Nowhere did I ever call you a liar. In fact, you have every right to think that Brees, Thomas and Jenkins are liars whether they have anything to gain from it or not. That is your right. I'm sorry but you somehow totally misinterpreted my reply. Read it over again carefully and you'll understand. I did in fact misread it. Your post read they not you. My apologies! I've been reading SR too much lately.

10-29-2020, 01:38 PM	#3
AsylumGuido 10000 POST CLUB Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Bossier City, LA Posts: 26,707	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II I did in fact misread it. Your post read you not they. My apologies! It's all cool, Rugs ... just like with Brees and Thomas.

10-29-2020, 02:46 PM	#4
st thomas Site Donor 2018 Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: lafayette Posts: 7,753	Re: Saints willing to consider Michael Thomas trade? Originally Posted by Rugby Saint II I did in fact misread it. Your post read they not you. My apologies! I've been reading SR too much lately. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Rugby Saint II likes this.