|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; Carr wanted out and we kept him anyway. Mickey Loomis is so trash....
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#41 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Kenner, LA
Posts: 7,999
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
Carr wanted out and we kept him anyway. Mickey Loomis is so trash.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
| |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,303
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
I dont believe Carr really wanted out. I believe he was due to make $40m, his market is $20-25m, we asked him to take a pay cut, and instead he dared Loomis to cut him and let him test the market, knowing Loomis could not give up that D. Cutting Carr would have triggered a cap hit that forced a rebuild year and if there are three words in the english language that Loomis cannot stand they are rebuild, sober, and a common slang term for female genitalia.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
Originally Posted by BakoSaint
https://x.com/nfl/status/18988710626...-HZkcubK8lB6Vw![]()
2yrs 46M 26 guaranteed. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Dec 2018
Posts: 2,303
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
More total money than you discussed but a lot less guaranteed, $26m vs $35m. In all likelihood this is effectively a 1 year $26m deal with a team option for a second year at $20m if Adams does not decline as quickly as expected. And for all we know the $46m number includes some incredibly unlikely bonuses like for winning rings and getting 1500 yards receiving and this is really a 2 year $30 million deal if Adams doesnt trigger big escalator clauses.
Actually this is the second time in 3 years the Rams have given a free agent WR a $46 million contract with over $25 million guaranteed. The last was Allen Robinson, and that did not work out so well. So I maintain my opinion that its too much money, even if a stupid desperate team whose window has probably closed did it. Glad we aren't that team on Adams at least. I guess the argument is a deal like this could make sense for a team like the Rams that has a Superbowl caliber QB whose window to win again is rapidly closing and wants to go all-in for one more year. Like the Saints around 2020. It would make no sense for the 2025 Saints that are the exact opposite and need to rebuild. It's probably still a mistake for the Rams. Adams is old and rapidly declining. |
Last edited by BakoSaint; 03-09-2025 at 07:24 PM.. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
5000 POSTS! +
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: The Free State of Idaho
Posts: 5,735
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 2,819
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
I don’t like carr but I don’t think we are a better team without him. Rattler can sit another year before he is given a chance. I think he has potential but I’d rather ride with carr and possibly draft Dart if he is there in round 2.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
10000 POST CLUB
|
Re: Saints 2025 Off-Season Roster Moves
Originally Posted by BakoSaint
Agree we are not the team for Adams. He's a luxury and Saints need to rebuild the roster. ![]()
While his contract terms are similar to Robinson, the mistake you make is in equating the two beyond that. Over the last six years Adams recorded 609 receptions for 7,647 yards and 64 TDs, while Robinson had 308 receptions for 3,456 yards and 17 TDs. If anyone didn't deserve the money, it was Robinson but I'll bet the Rams didn't count on him having foot surgery in year 1. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,465
|
Sources: Patriots to trade Davon Godchaux to Saints for pick
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
10000 POST CLUB
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Bossier City, LA
Posts: 26,465
|
Re: Sources: Patriots to trade Davon Godchaux to Saints for pick
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|