05-08-2008, 11:37 AM | #111 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Every defense has to cover the TE, no matter who the TE is.
|
Latest Blogs | |
2023 New Orleans Saints: Training Camp Last Blog: 08-01-2023 By: MarchingOn
Puck the Fro Browl! Last Blog: 02-05-2023 By: neugey
CFP: "Just Keep Doing What You're Doing" Last Blog: 12-08-2022 By: neugey |
05-08-2008, 12:00 PM | #112 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Moss and Shockey are 2 different players who had different problems. You can't compare the 2. Moss showed up to practice and camp. Shockey doesn't.
When Shockey wasn't hurt he was productive. Why does everything thinks he wasn't used. He was!!! It was a far different team when he got hurt, so much different they went on to have one of the biggest upsets in SB history. We to can win a SB without him. |
05-08-2008, 12:11 PM | #113 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,755
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
I don't see why I can't compare the two. If anything, Moss was more of a distraction on his team than Shockey.
|
05-08-2008, 12:21 PM | #114 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,776
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by JKool
I think it's stickier than that. Shockey is under contract. Actually it's pretty cap friendly. He's going to want it reworked. The question is when, and how long will he be satisfied to play under the existing contract.
These are all unknowns. The Saints would be perfectly within their rights to say: "You signed it. Play it out." But the problem I see is that if this, or anything else, makes Shockey unhappy, then what effect will it have in the locker room. There has to be clarity on both sides on how that would work. Ideally for the team it would be "Show us 2 years of production, then we'll get the huge contract to you." But I'm unsure if that would work.
BTW offensive performances were nearly as strong. These teams finished outside the top 10 in points scored the season they won: 82 redskins (strike shortened), 90 giants, 00 ravens, 02 bucs, 03 pats, 07 giants. I believe the 07 giants are the first SB team in this period to finish outside the top 10 on both sides of the ball and still win. Looking at the offense started to point to point differential. It seems to be the strongest indicator of all of championship success. Only one team who won the SB since 1970 fell outside the top 10 in point differential for the regular season: The 2007 New York Giants.
For example in Dan Marino's career with the Dolphins, the offense was consistently excellent. But the only year they went to the SB, the defense was outstanding too. There were other years where the defense was up and down, but they never had the same success.
You need both. SFIAH |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
05-08-2008, 12:26 PM | #115 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by Euphoria
Shockey was used...i never said he wasnt...they just didnt know how to use him best...the giants are a run team...that have been since tiki....shockey is explosive as a pass catcher and would flourish in a pass first system...thats what we have....thats a great match....no team needs him to win a super bowl....but u dont need a car to get around...get the idea?....shockey plays hard....moss plays hard too....now.....shockey is consistant when he isnt hurt and if i can find the video of him plowing thru defenders without a helmet then i will post it...hes a beast
|
"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
|
|
05-08-2008, 12:46 PM | #116 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,776
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Thanks for talking about costs papz.
Originally Posted by papz
Maybe for just the 2nd rounder.
Had better production on the field than any wide receiver in history. As for those numbers, that's close to his current contract (5 years, $26.3 million, looks like about $14 million guaranteed of which he's already collected about $10 million in signing and option bonuses)
Does a productive offense really need a superstar at every position? We're having this discussion as if our TEs didn't make plays or contribute Just poking around I found this Giants fans thread on the guy. If you get a chance take a read: Feeling bad for Shockey - NJ.com: Ledger on the Giants SFIAH |
Super Bowl Championships: New Orleans Saints:1, Carolina:0, Atlanta Chokers: STILL ZERO
Only Atlanta choked in an unchokable situation... Life is definitely good. |
|
05-08-2008, 12:52 PM | #117 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
SFIAH, how did u become such an expert on this subject?.....im not dawgin u im just curious...u have a lot of insight....is there something that u are looking at that we are not?
|
05-08-2008, 01:01 PM | #118 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,634
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
If we bring in Shockey and he's used like Payton wants too then he will be cheerleading for the team because we're going to win games this year and make it to the playoffs. Shockey will take pressure off Colston and Reggie.
|
05-08-2008, 01:18 PM | #119 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
SFIAH, thanks for the thoughts on points allowed. I think the conclusion might be something like this: the best predictor of SB victory is a top 10 defense in terms of points allowed.
However, since points allowed is a combined stat (it measures offensive as well as defensive success), it is hard to say which contribution (offensive or defensive) is more important. Thus, defense wins championships isn't supported by "points allowed" results alone. Perhaps we could compare points allowed to traditional offensive stats (like yards per play, completion percentage, or something) to traditional defensive stats (like yards allowed per play, interceptions, sacks, or something) to determine which contributed more to the "points allowed". Maybe time of possession would be an interesting way to tease apart the contributions of offense and defense to points allowed? This relates to the Shockey dispute in only one way. If Shockey were significant to increasing our time of possession, he would directly contribute to the important "points allowed" statistic. Of course, the "cost" and "character" arguments would still stand on their own. Interesting! |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
05-08-2008, 01:21 PM | #120 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,755
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL
So I think we both can agree that's not bad compensation and affordable.
Honestly it would be great if we could get Shockey for the right price... but if we didn't make a move for him, we'll be just fine. For me, it's more of me wanting you to see that both sides of the ball need to be addressed just not the defense. I've agreed with everything you've said this offseason besides the criticizing of any suggestion that we could use more help on offense. |
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
All little common sense goes a long way. |
|