|
this is a discussion within the Saints Community Forum; SFIAH, how did u become such an expert on this subject?.....im not dawgin u im just curious...u have a lot of insight....is there something that u are looking at that we are not?...
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
SFIAH, how did u become such an expert on this subject?.....im not dawgin u im just curious...u have a lot of insight....is there something that u are looking at that we are not?
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
The Professor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Lithonia, GA
Posts: 2,783
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by CantonLegend
In general: the title of Professor is an actual job description. University professors make their living researching and analyzing information.![]()
As a Saints fan: I've been with the Saints since I was a kid. A season ticket holder until I left for college. I'm invested. I'm really doing nothing more than any avid fantasy footballer would do. It's just that the Saints are my fantasy football team. SFIAH |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,793
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by SaintFanInATLHELL
So I think we both can agree that's not bad compensation and affordable.![]()
Honestly it would be great if we could get Shockey for the right price... but if we didn't make a move for him, we'll be just fine. For me, it's more of me wanting you to see that both sides of the ball need to be addressed just not the defense. I've agreed with everything you've said this offseason besides the criticizing of any suggestion that we could use more help on offense. |
Everyone is entitled to be stupid, but some abuse the privilege.
All little common sense goes a long way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Every defense has to cover the TE, no matter who the TE is.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Logic Troll
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Southern Louisiana
Posts: 565
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by SFIAH
I disagree. It was less disingenuous and more sarcastic. ![]()
Yeah, but every defense does not have to cover different TEs the same way. Hell, I would stay way off of Eric Johnson. Better chance of the ball deflecting into a defender's hands than there is of him catching it. Yeah, I know, I know, he isn't really that bad, but he has to suck up the abuse until he makes up for it. Gates and Gonzales are the top receivers on their teams, the main targets. They are not defended the way Crumpler or Witten were, because they were usually more short range targets that can bust out a long one. And they in turn are not defended the way Johnson and Miller were, because they are not the threats that the aforementioned TE's are. Nope. Not a chance. |
"Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so." -- Douglas Adams.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
5000 POSTS! +
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Moss and Shockey are 2 different players who had different problems. You can't compare the 2. Moss showed up to practice and camp. Shockey doesn't.
When Shockey wasn't hurt he was productive. Why does everything thinks he wasn't used. He was!!! It was a far different team when he got hurt, so much different they went on to have one of the biggest upsets in SB history. We to can win a SB without him. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
1000 Posts +
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
Originally Posted by Euphoria
Shockey was used...i never said he wasnt...they just didnt know how to use him best...the giants are a run team...that have been since tiki....shockey is explosive as a pass catcher and would flourish in a pass first system...thats what we have....thats a great match....no team needs him to win a super bowl....but u dont need a car to get around...get the idea?....shockey plays hard....moss plays hard too....now.....shockey is consistant when he isnt hurt and if i can find the video of him plowing thru defenders without a helmet then i will post it...hes a beast
![]()
|
"deal with it or you can go play the saints and get trounced by 30 and you won't have to worry about it."-colin cowherd
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Problem?
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 11,793
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
I don't see why I can't compare the two. If anything, Moss was more of a distraction on his team than Shockey.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,634
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
If we bring in Shockey and he's used like Payton wants too then he will be cheerleading for the team because we're going to win games this year and make it to the playoffs. Shockey will take pressure off Colston and Reggie.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
1000 Posts +
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison, WI
Posts: 2,423
|
Re: payton wants shockey...................
SFIAH, thanks for the thoughts on points allowed. I think the conclusion might be something like this: the best predictor of SB victory is a top 10 defense in terms of points allowed.
However, since points allowed is a combined stat (it measures offensive as well as defensive success), it is hard to say which contribution (offensive or defensive) is more important. Thus, defense wins championships isn't supported by "points allowed" results alone. Perhaps we could compare points allowed to traditional offensive stats (like yards per play, completion percentage, or something) to traditional defensive stats (like yards allowed per play, interceptions, sacks, or something) to determine which contributed more to the "points allowed". Maybe time of possession would be an interesting way to tease apart the contributions of offense and defense to points allowed? This relates to the Shockey dispute in only one way. If Shockey were significant to increasing our time of possession, he would directly contribute to the important "points allowed" statistic. Of course, the "cost" and "character" arguments would still stand on their own. Interesting! |
"... I was beating them with my eyes the whole game..." - Aaron Brooks
|
|
![]() |